DID YOU KNOW
Spontaneous Human Combustion (SHC) is a phenomenon as mystifying as it is horrifying, purportedly involving the burning of a human body without an apparent external source of ignition. Throughout history, SHC has been a topic of speculative science, urban legends, and a smattering of eerie anecdotes. In this article, we delve into what SHC is, explore how it's supposed to work, examine the available data, and recount true events that have been attributed to this enigmatic occurrence.
Characteristics of SHC Cases
Typical characteristics of supposed SHC cases include:
- The victim is almost completely consumed, usually inside their home.
- The extremities such as hands, feet, or part of the leg may remain unburned.
- Objects in close proximity to the victim, including furniture and clothing, often remain undamaged.
- The combustion leaves a greasy residue and a stench.
- There is no apparent source of a spark or flame that started the burning.
Understanding Spontaneous Human Combustion
SHC refers to the reported cases where a person's body is found incinerated without an obvious cause for the fire. Typically, the surroundings and objects in close proximity to the victim show little or no signs of burning. This has led many to wonder if the human body itself could somehow ignite and sustain a flame.
The phenomenon has been noted for centuries, with historical records dating back to the 17th century documenting instances of SHC. The typical scenario involves the discovery of a severely burned corpse seated or lying in a room with virtually no damage to the surrounding area except for some soot on the ceiling and walls. Often, the extremities such as hands and feet remain intact while the torso and head are charred beyond recognition.
How Is It Supposed to Work?
The mechanics of SHC are not understood, mainly because it's not recognized as a legitimate medical or scientific phenomenon by the majority of the community. Several theories have been proposed over the years to explain how SHC might occur:
-
The Wicking Effect: This theory suggests that human body fat can act similarly to candle wax. Clothing or hair might work as a wick, and once ignited, possibly by a small external flame like a cigarette, the body fat could keep the flame burning. This slow burn could, theoretically, lead to the conditions consistent with SHC cases.
-
Static Electricity: Some have hypothesized that a build-up of static electricity inside the body, or from an external source, could provide the spark that sets off a fatal blaze.
-
Methane Build-Up: Methane is a highly flammable gas produced in the human intestines. The suggestion here is that an excess build-up and some trigger could lead to combustion.
-
The Godman Effect: This term was coined for the concept of a new subatomic particle that could cause spontaneous combustion.
-
Pyrokinesis: At the fringes of the debate are paranormal explanations, like the psychokinetic ability to set things on fire with one's mind.
Available Data and True Events
Scientific data on SHC is virtually nonexistent because the phenomenon hasn't been observed under controlled conditions. However, there are documented cases that are often cited by proponents:
-
Mary Reeser (1951): In St. Petersburg, Florida, the charred body of Mary Reeser was found in her apartment. Her body was almost completely consumed by fire, yet the apartment and her surroundings suffered minimal damage.
-
Michael Faherty (2010): In Galway, Ireland, Michael Faherty was found burned in his home with no evidence of external fire sources. The coroner's report mentioned SHC as a possible cause, which is rare in official documents.
Despite such cases, there is a significant amount of skepticism. Forensic investigations often point out that overlooked external sources of fire could be responsible. For example, the "wick effect" theory is supported by experiments conducted by forensic analysts, demonstrating that a body can indeed burn in a manner consistent with SHC accounts under the right conditions.
Conclusion
While there's a trove of anecdotal evidence and a few peculiar cases that remain unexplained, the lack of reproducible evidence means SHC remains a topic more suited to horror tales and paranormal discussions than to scientific journals. Whether a bizarre medical condition, an unfortunate reaction to environmental factors, or merely the result of unusual circumstances during accidental fires, SHC continues to ignite debate and curiosity.
It's important to note that scientific consensus does not acknowledge SHC as a real phenomenon, largely due to the lack of verifiable evidence and a plausible mechanism. However, the human fascination with unexplained mysteries ensures that SHC will likely remain a topic of conversation and investigation for years to come.
As Always, Thanks For Reading
Rick
References:
Nickell, J. (1996). "Not-So-Spontaneous Human Combustion". Skeptical Inquirer Magazine, 20(5).
Benjamin Radford. (2011). "Coroner Concludes Irishman Died of Spontaneous Human Combustion". Live Science.
JACQUIN SANDERS (1991). "The Fiery End of Mrs. Reeser". Tampa Bay Times