Hate: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship
Hate: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship
definition, we hear many incorrect assumptions that it is either absolutely unprotected or absolutely protected from censorship. Rather, U.S. law allows government to punish hateful or discriminatory speech in specific contexts when it directly causes imminent serious harm. Yet, government may not
punish such speech solely because its message is disfavored, disturbing, or vaguely feared to possibly contribute to some future harm. Hate speech censorship proponents stress the potential harms such speech might further: discrimination, violence, and psychic injuries. However, there has been
little analysis of whether censorship effectively counters the feared injuries. Citing evidence from many countries, this book shows that hate speech are at best ineffective and at worst counterproductive. Therefore, prominent social justice advocates worldwide maintain that the best way to resist
hate and promote equality is not censorship, but rather, vigorous counterspeech and activism.
Author: Nadine Strossen
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Published: 03/02/2020
Pages: 272
Binding Type: Paperback
Weight: 0.65lbs
Size: 8.20h x 5.50w x 0.90d
ISBN: 9780190089009
About the Author
New York Law School professor Nadine Strossen, the immediate past President of the American Civil Liberties Union (1991-2008), is a leading expert and frequent speaker/media commentator on constitutional law and civil liberties, who has testified before Congress on multiple occasions. She serves on
the advisory boards of the ACLU, Electronic Privacy Information Center, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), and Heterodox Academy. The National Law Journal has named Strossen one of America's "100 Most Influential Lawyers," and several other national publications have named her one
of the country's most influential women. HATE was selected by Washington University as its 2019 "Common Read."